Employment Matters

ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS ACT QUIETLY AMENDED BRINGING MAJOR CHANGE TO EMPLOYERS’ POTENTIAL EXPOSURE FOR DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS

The Illinois Legislature has enacted a change to the Illinois Human Rights Act (the Act or the IHRA), effective January 1, 2025, that is likely to create significant concern for Illinois employers.

The Illinois Human Rights Act:

The IHRA is the Illinois law that prohibits employers and others from discriminating against an individual on the basis of protected classifications, such as age, gender, race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability and others. The federal law under Title VII, enforced by the EEOC, provides a similar federal law right to pursue an action for unlawful discrimination.

The Change:

Section 7A-102 of the IHRA (775 ILCS 5/7A-102) is the section that sets forth the time within which an employee must file a Charge of Discrimination under the Act. The failure to file a timely charge means that in most cases the employee will be barred from pursuing a claim for discrimination against their employer for the alleged event.

The Act has for decades provided a limited 300-day period from the date of the alleged discrimination within which the employee must file a charge against the employer with the Illinois Human Rights Department, or for the Department itself to file a Charge. Under certain circumstances the time for filing a Charge of Discrimination could (and still may be) extended.

However, beginning this month an employee or the Department will have the opportunity to file a Charge of Discrimination within two (2) years after the date that the civil rights violation allegedly has been committed.

The Impact On Illinois Employers:

The change is significant. Illinois employers will now be required to respond to a Charge of Discrimination filed with the Department up to two (2) years after the event complained of. Therefore the employer’s potential liability for workplace discrimination violations now extend for a longer period than ever before. Employers will be required to participate in investigations of activities asserted to be discrimination violations for a period of time that extends more than twice the current period.

And remember, the right to file a Charge of Discrimination does not end when the employee leaves, whether voluntarily or involuntarily. If the employee asserts that a discriminatory action was taken during employment or that the discriminatory event was (in whole or in part) the employee’s termination from employment, then the time period for bringing that claim to the Department and initiating the action is now remarkably longer.

What To Do?

            Modify Workpace Policies:    Illinois employers will need to focus on revising workplace management policies to include some common sense extensions of current management directions. The need to have required procedures for investigating and maintaining information concerning potential discrimination issues is going to be even more important. Information about activities that could be the subject of a claim of unlawful discrimination will likely be harder to gather and to demonstrate as the time is enlarged to twice as long as it used to be. All potential discrimination situations are implicated, but sexual harassment and disability discrimination in particular are often the circumstances most subject to the need for detailed review and information gathering.

Consider implementing third party investigations in appropriate circumstances as part of the protocol, when certain “hot button” situations arise.

Review disciplinary rules for managers who fail to report to upper management or to human resources the circumstances that could give rise to claims of unlawful discrimination.

            Exit Interviews:          The use of exit interviews or questionaires is going to be a useful and important tool, if not already implemented. If properly used, these can help to determine if there are circumstances that may not be fully known to the employer and that could be a source of a discrimination action involving either the departing employee or other employees during the months and years following.

            Use Separation Agreements:  The use of separation agreements for voluntary and involuntary termination situations is going to become even more important. In some situations, where there are little or no concerns about unlawful activities, this will continue to be a case-by-case determination. But in others, the importance of simple, understandable separation agreements is going to be hugely important.

 A departing employee can waive and release most of the known or unknown claims available to them under the Illinois Human Rights Act and other common law situations and statutory laws. Such a release, backed by consideration, is now going to be even more important for the employer’s ability to try to limit future claims of unlawful discrimination.

Be aware, however, that Separation Agreements must be thoughtfully drafted with the help of, or reviewed by, the employer’s counsel. There are already legal requirements that must be included in some agreements in order to release for example age discrimination claims under federal law. And recent changes to the law prohibit unilateral confidentiality or non-disparagement clauses that purport to cover sexual harassment or discrimination claims. Other considerations are equally important.

            Are All Employers Doing Business In Illinois Covered By The New Law?

You bet. The Illinois Human Rights Act applies to all employers who employ at least one (1) person in Illinois. Remember that just because your company has its headquarters outside of Illinois does not mean that it is free from the reach of the Illinois Human Rights Act. This is particularly true with the greater use of remote workers.

Pay attention, reach out to your counsel, and know the law!

If you are not sure what to do, or where to start, we can help. Contact Marc Sherman. https://mshermanlaw.com/contact/

Business Entities, Employment Matters, General Litigation

THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE IS WORTH KNOWING ABOUT

What is the Attorney-Client Privilege?

You have the right to have all of your communications with your Attorney, or prospective Attorney (yes, even before formally engaging them), be treated as confidential, whether regarding a legal matter for which you are seeking Attorney advice or involvement or discussion of matters for which the Attorney’s advice is helpful or necessary.

The Attorney-Client Privilege allows you to prevent disclosure of conversations, letters, e-mails, facsimiles and other forms of correspondence and communication between you and the Attorney and Law Firm staff representing or consulting you, in almost all circumstances. This information is held in confidence and should not be disclosed to others, except where you have directed the Law Firm to do so.

Why is this important?

The privacy of your confidential information, regardless of the form, has a value to you. Confidential information contains valuable, private information simply because it is non-public or possibly because it may be used against you if it becomes known by others. The law protects your right to limit disclosure of sensitive information, so that your discussions with your Attorney or prospective Attorney can be open and transparent.

Isn’t this just for litigation situations? No.

The Attorney-Client Privilege is important in a variety of contexts. Consider a new business or product idea that could be hijacked by others. Consider the timing and specifics of business plans and strategies you may be implementing. Consider your thoughts about actions against an employer or, on the flip side, the steps to be taken as an employer in dealing with the workers or vendors for your business. 

There are many, many reasons why protection of your communications with your Attorney and Attorney staff can and should be considered.

What do I specifically do?

Since the privilege is yours, you also have the power to maintain it and the authority to waive and forfeit the Attorney-Client Privilege.

Your own verbal communications with the Attorney or Attorney staff will usually be considered to be protected. However, whether as an individual or as an owner or employee of a business entity, be mindful of two things: You can lose or “waive” the Privilege if your private communications happen to include or happen even to be near others who are not within your protected circle and can see or hear your intended private information. Also, you can waive the Privilege if you are sharing or disclosing the contents of Attorney-Client protected communications with another who is not in a position to share the Privilege.  

If you are a business owner or management employee communicating with the business Attorney, keep in mind that circulating a privileged email, memo or the substance of the communication between you and the Attorney can later affect the ability of your business to prevent its use or disclosure.

Best practice: Start by protecting your privilege and your private information by doing the following:  

Include a header in written correspondence or the “regarding” line in your emails with your Attorney stating that the document or the information is expected to be part of an Attorney-Client Privileged Communication. Or, at a minimum, identify the communication as “Attorney-Client Communication” or similar words.

Of course, give thought to the persons that you join as recipients in the email or to whom you circulate your documents and correspondence. And, be thoughtful of where you are having your Attorney meetings or who is on the call or email chain with you.

And equally important, be sure that you are individually or for your business, keeping your eyes on the other available tools that you have under the Law for protecting your confidential information, trade secrets and the like.

If you are not sure, ask your Attorney. Marc Sherman can be reached at msherman@mshermanlaw.com for further explanation, if necessary.

Business Entities, Employment Matters, Noncompete Agreements

REVIEW OF NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS IS REQUIRED BY NEW FTC RULE

There has been alot of buzz about the Federal Trade Commission’s recently approved final rule prohibiting noncompete provisions in most circumstances. A review of the agreements that you have in place and that are likely to be used in the future is worthwhile.

Why the concern?

Employers have traditionally looked for strong ways to protect trade secrets and other confidential information, and to limit employees from infringing on their business interests. Noncompetition covenants, whether in employee handbooks or in separate agreements, have been a useful tool. Often just the threat of enforcement is a deterrent.

Many noncompetition agreements are unenforceable under the FTC’s new rule.

The FTC rule prohibits all noncompete restrictions for employees, independent contractors, interns, volunteers, apprentices, and even sole proprietors who provide services to business entities. 

There are carve-outs for existing and future noncompetition restrictions that are created for sale of a business, and for current restrictions on senior “policy making” executives who meet a salary threshhold. However, new noncompete restrictions even for senior executives are not permitted.

Are all Employer protections gone?

No. But thoughtful drafing is going to be needed.

The “noncompete clause” prohibited by the FTC rule includes any “term or condition of employment that prohibits a worker from, penalizes a worker for, or functions to prevent a worker from (a) seeking or accepting work in the U.S. with a different person or entity after the employment ends, or (b) operating a business in the U.S. after the employment ends.

Important restrictions on the activities of employees, independent contractors and others will remain and will be even more important to monitor and enforce.

Noncompete clauses that function during the term of work or employment are untouched. This may seem academic, but the specifics and enforcement will become more relevant. This is particularly true, since the implied threat of enforcement has traditionally been the strongest reason that an employee or contractor avoids future work that interferes with the former Employer.

Other worthwhile restrictions survive the FTC rule. For example, thoughtful use of Confidentiality Agreements and Non-Disclosure Agreements, including specifics for monitoring return of materials and information is necessary. These will become an essential Employer tool during and following a worker’s services in order to protect legitimate business interests.  And, of course, every business should review Trade Secrets guidelines and practices to see that they are tightly drafted, implemented and available for enforcement when necessary.

The Upshot? Take Action Without Delay.

Waiting until an issue arises to review your policies and agreements is like ignoring an annual trip to the dentist and waiting until the tooth begins to hurt. Preventive care of your business interests is good practice that can avoid significant legal costs and frustrations later.

Attorney Marc Sherman recommends that every business pull out and dust off existing policy manuals, internal agreements, and external independent contractor agreements for a critical review. Also, consider whether new focus on Trade Secret protections, Confidentiality Covenants and other restrictive clauses need to be implemented or whether current policies can be reasonably beefed up.

Clients who would like to review the FTC rule will find it here: https://ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/noncompete-rule.pdf

Anyone who would like to discuss how this important topic affects their business and business interests can contact Marc Sherman by email to msherman@mshermanlaw.com.

Employment Matters

ILLINOIS FAMILY BEREAVEMENT LEAVE ACT MODIFICATIONS

Effective January 1, 2023 The Illinois legislature has adopted changes to the former Child Bereavement Leave Act that expand the scope of the law for Illinois workers at companies with over 50 employees.

Availability of Unpaid Leave

Employees may use up to 10 days of unpaid bereavement leave to do the following:

– Attend the funeral of a covered family member

– Make arrangements necessitated by the death of a covered family member

– Grieve the death of a covered family member.

– Be absent from work due to one of the following event [Employers may not require employees to identify which category of event the leave pertains to as a condition of obtaining leave under the FBLA]:

– An unsuccessful round of intrauterine insemination or of an assisted reproductive technology procedure.

– A failed adoption match or an adoption that is not finalized because it is contested by another party.

– A failed surrogacy agreement.

– A diagnosis that negatively affects pregnancy or fertility.

– A stillbirth.

A covered family member includes an employee’s child, stepchild, spouse, domestic partner, sibling, parent, mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandchild, grandparent, or a stepparent.

Bereavement leave must be completed within 60 days after the date on which the employee receives notice of the qualifying event listed above. The employee must provide the Company with at least 48 hours advance notice of their intention to take bereavement leave unless providing notice is not reasonable and practicable.

Reasonable Documentation for Bereavement Leave Requests

An employee seeking a bereavement leave of absence is required to provide reasonable documentation when requesting leave. In the event of a death of a covered family member, reasonable documentation includes a death certificate, published obituary, or written verification of death, burial, or memorial services. Reasonable documentation for covered events related to pregnancy, adoption, surrogacy, and fertility includes a form provided by the Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) to be filled out by a healthcare practitioner. https://labor.illinois.gov/contact/dam/soi/en/web/idol/laws-rules/conmed/documents/family-bereavement-leave-act-form.pdf

Employment Matters

The Illinois Employee Background Fairness Act Presents New Challenge For Illinois Employers Using Criminal Background Checks

The Society For Human Resource Management and a recent article by SmithAmundsen LLC in the Illinois State Bar Association’s Illinois Lawyer NOW magazine, highlight for employers the newest and most restrictive and cumbersome law for use of an applicant’s or employee’s criminal conviction history. The modifications to The Illinois Human Rights Act made by this new law permit employers to consider an individual’s criminal conviction history only if there is a substantial relationship between the criminal history and the position sought or held, or if the employer can show that the individual’s employment raises an unreasonable risk to property or to the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public, or if otherwise permitted by law. Criminal background checks can still be done, but both reports caution that employers review the significant issues that should be addressed before using the information for employment decisions.

Our blog posts are designed to help you follow up on items that can save you time, save you money and protect many aspects of your life and your business.

If you hear of other hints and helpful strategies that our clients and colleagues may benefit from, please send a note or a link to: mshermanlawoffice@icloud.com